Front desk
Account for phones, patients, scheduling, payments, shared inboxes, and limited time to investigate an unexpected message.
Dental practices combine patient scheduling and records with insurance, laboratories, imaging, suppliers, payment services, payroll, and outsourced technology support.
A manageable simulation should practice one relevant verification step without using patient details or disrupting chairside care and front-desk operations.
Care-aware planning • Fictional scenarios • Privacy boundaries • Practical reporting
Start with the workforce, systems, and verification routes involved in the selected workflow. The exercise must remain secondary to patient care, safety, product quality, and real incident response.
Account for phones, patients, scheduling, payments, shared inboxes, and limited time to investigate an unexpected message.
Use a routine workforce scenario that cannot be confused with an image, treatment plan, prescription, or urgent patient instruction.
Practice verifying fictional payer, attachment, payment, and account-change requests through the established process.
Use invented organizations and files when reinforcing known portal, callback, order, and delivery routes.
Give the scenario one learning objective and one explainable next step. Use fictional people and records, and avoid urgent clinical, patient, safety, recall, or public-health themes.
Practice reaching the known laboratory service independently using a fictional case with no patient or treatment information.
Ask staff to validate an invented invoice and vendor through the normal purchasing process.
Reinforce checking sender, expected context, and destination before opening a fictional administrative document.
Practice contacting the known IT provider or opening the normal service instead of using an unexpected renewal link.
| Consideration | Question to answer | Required preparation |
|---|---|---|
| Patient information | Could the message or landing page reveal a patient, treatment, image, appointment, or claim? | Use entirely fictional neutral content and keep it outside clinical and practice-management systems. |
| Shared inboxes | Can the practice reliably identify who acted in a shared mailbox or workstation? | Report mailbox or device observations separately when individual attribution is not reliable. |
| Care timing | Could the exercise interrupt chairside care, opening, closing, or a high-volume appointment period? | Choose a quieter window with the practice manager available to pause the campaign. |
| IT support | Who receives a report or real incident when technology support is external? | Test the complete handoff and document primary and backup contacts before launch. |
State the request being tested, the expected verification or reporting action, the authorized workforce group, and how observations will be used.
Document exclusions, data boundaries, operational approvers, delivery windows, escalation contacts, and conditions that require the campaign to stop.
Test representative accounts, shifts, devices, accessibility tools, email controls, landing pages, event records, reporting routes, and follow-up material.
Prepare security, IT, privacy, clinical or operational leadership, communications, and relevant providers while preserving normal handling of real reports.
Explain the expected action, provide relevant private learning, and assign every workflow or control improvement to a responsible owner.
Record intended recipients, exclusions, successful deliveries, unique recipient events, verified reports, response handling, and completed follow-up. Reconcile automated link inspection and repeated events before attributing an action to a person.
Show actual counts beside percentages and document role, shared-device use, delivery, clinical workload, and reporting access. A shared-mailbox event does not establish which employee acted.
Use findings to improve reporting, verification, identity, email, access, vendor, or support processes. A simulation observes a limited interaction; it does not measure clinical competence, overall workforce risk, or regulatory compliance.
Common questions about Phishmake's features, onboarding, and support, answered to help you get started with confidence.
No. Use an invented laboratory, case, file, and patient context. Real images, treatment details, case identifiers, and patient information are unnecessary for the learning objective.
Treat it as a shared workflow unless reliable individual attribution exists. Use the result to improve mailbox handling and reporting rather than infer individual performance.
A provider can support delivery and reporting, but the practice should approve the audience, objective, scenario, data handling, timing, stop conditions, communications, and follow-up.
No. A simulation can support a broader awareness program but does not by itself determine or establish compliance with HIPAA or any other legal or regulatory requirement.
Explore how Phishmake connects controlled workforce simulations, relevant training, campaign activity, and follow-up reporting in one workflow.